Q:
Claude, to repay you properly for the many happy hours in which
you've scared me witless, I'd like to take you to a dark place you'd
probably rather forget. Are you game?
A:
I certainly am, Reb. The question is, are you?
Q: Oh, I'm always prepared to be completely unprepared. Let's see...The year is 1997. You've spent the last two years composing a
series of thrillers you'd hoped would make your name and fortune.
Tell us of the volley of queries you sent...the number of
rejections, form, full and partial reads...and how it felt when, at
last, you surrendered.
A:
Though I’d written three novels by mid-97, the only one I’d
worked with on the query side was the series opener, Vigilante.
I’m going on memory here but it seems to me most of my querying
activity was during the first half of 1996. This was back before
email when any efforts at seeking agent representation were done via
mail with a SASE (that’s Self-Addressed-Stamped-Envelope) included.
Most agents were located in NYC and L.A., so my uncle in Burbank had
sent me a roll of U.S. stamps which weren’t readily found in
Canada. I don’t remember exactly how many queries I sent, maybe 75
or so at the rate of 2 or 3 per week to avoid too much concurrent
interest. However… Most of what I got back were rejections: some
personalized...others, form letters...and a couple of hand scribbles
directly on my query letters. I did receive three requests for
partials and one for a full but nothing came out of those in the end.
What really annoyed me were the 20-30 who never responded. Bastards
were probably in the business just for the free stamps. The
experience left me disappointed though not to any major extent. At
the time, the writing and dreaming of selling my stories was more of
a game than a career plan.
Q:
And so began a silence of twelve years. At some point, I
remember reading you were represented by an agent for a while. What
happened?
A:
Just to clarify the timeline, the agent representation happened once
I got back into writing in 2009. I had reviewed, re-edited and
self-published my three manuscripts in the spring and was working on
getting my name out via social media, particularly Twitter. As it
turned out, an editor with whom I chatted frequently was learning the
ropes to become an agent, her tutor being a childhood friend and
seasoned agent himself. When they launched the agency in December,
2009, I was offered representation along with fifteen to twenty other
writers. The relationship lasted eighteen months, after which our
agent either melted, imploded or spontaneously combusted. The
incident was not recorded so we never learned what exactly happened
to the bit--uh, lady. :)
Q:
Going back to 1997 after you wrote your third novel, did you
believe that you were quitting for keeps...or was your spirit 'taking
five'?
A:
To be honest, neither. I had written Vigilante because a
story had grown in my head and I needed to let it out. While working
on it, a sequel formed and the result was The Consultant. Mind
Games was waiting for its turn next. Once I finished the third
novel, nothing else was screaming for release. As mentioned earlier,
it’s not like I harbored a secret desire to become a bestselling
author at the time. My studies and career were in human resources
management and I considered my writing as a hobby, much like my
painting and guitar. These were leisure activities which allowed me
to express myself, nothing more.
Q:
So, twelve years of silence. At what point did you start
to feel the itch to write again? Did you jump right back into
it as if you'd never stopped...or did it take you a while to get back
in the groove?
A:
What got the itch going again is when I decided to bring my first
three novels back to the surface in April 2009. Times had changed
during those twelve years and POD suppliers suddenly made it possible
for me to see my books as books, not stacks of 8.5 X 11 inch paper.
Revising and editing those manuscripts anew slipped me back into the
sport and by the time I was done with the third, my characters were
raring to go and looking for some action. I published The Homeless
Killer less than seven weeks later.
Q:
You made a remarkably bold decision in keeping the three
completed books set in the decade you wrote them--then picking up in
the present. What can you tell us about that?
A:
When I reviewed the first three books twelve years later, I felt
they still stood up and therefore saw no need to make them more
current. I laughed when reading a recent review where the reviewer
suggested Vigilante needed updating to get away from the 90s
feel. The story took place in 1995 and, apparently, I did a decent
job of reflecting that. I could have gone ahead and set book number 4
in 1998 and kept my characters younger. However, it just made sense
to write in relatively real time as I had in the past. After all, I’d
gotten older during that twelve year period. Why should my characters
get a break by enjoying existence without aging?
Q:
Cut to the moment of truth now. The year is 2009. You've
decided to self-publish your first three books and quickly followed
up with a fourth. Were you afflicted with feelings of failure at
first? Did you have any inkling of the pot of gold in store?
A:
To be honest, my initial goal in self-publishing the first three was
to hold actual finished products in my hands. I ordered a bunch of
copies of the first edition of Vigilante which I signed and
gave to each member of my immediate family. That was my satisfaction…
Until a complete stranger bought the book… That’s when I started
seriously thinking about recreating such transactions over and over
and got busy working on promoting. Sales were dismal for a couple of
years but I never considered it as failure but rather, frustration,
learning curves and opportunities for persistence. As for the pot of
gold, I’ll let you know as soon as I find it.
Q:
You're justly famous, Claude, for your Twitter following:
about 1/3 of a million, and growing. And you've told most
if not all of your secrets online, sharing the wealth with new
talent. But what sets you apart from your rivals still more is
the pleasure that you clearly take in the social side of Twitter.
You're accessible, supportive and really seem to care. Have
you always been this way or did the long silence change you?
A:
That really is how I’ve always been and it’s no doubt part of my
upbringing. Wherever I worked throughout my corporate career, I
always ended up being a “go to guy” when someone needed a hand or
information. If I can help someone out, I’m happy to do it. Over
the years, I’ve always been grateful for any help I received when I
was stuck and I simply believe in passing it along.
Q:
What percentage of your time is spent on social media? Am
I right in thinking you enjoy that as much as the writing itself?
A:
It’s difficult to measure as it’s not a scheduled activity but
rather an ongoing, as needed, one but I’d guesstimate that
percentage to be roughly 30%. Twitter, which is my primary social
media platform, is up and running 10 to 12 hours per day while I’m
doing a number of other book related activities in addition to
tweeting. Like many jobs I’ve held in the past, I enjoy the variety
involved in being a self-published author and part of that is the
social media aspect. In a sense, it replaces the social interactions
I once had with others back in the corporate world.
Q:
Productive though you are, you don't seem to be in a hurry.
What's the dream scenario of your production schedule?
A:
I’m not in a hurry and there is no scenario dreaming
involved in my production schedule. I start writing a book when I do
and finish at the end. I don’t map out my stories so establishing
timetables or deadlines doesn’t make sense to me. I write when it’s
time, sometimes thousands of words in a day, sometimes hundreds, some
days not at all. If I get something done quickly, it gets out sooner; if not, I release it later.
Q:
Please define your ideal reader.
A:
This was an interesting question which required much thought and
consideration in order to come up with an appropriate answer. Having
carefully weighed all applicable factors, I’d have to say my ideal
reader is anyone who loves my books.
Q:
What are the narrative values you cherish the most as a writer?
A:
Writing is an art form and art, among other definitions, is a method
of expression. Where an artist recounts his story with hues and
shapes or a musician organizes notes and tempo to share her auditory
tale, a writer composes his vision with narrative. Although I’m an
artist and musician as well, my preferred mode of expression is
writing as I find it offers the most extensive palette, allowing me
to create not only an image or a moment but rather, a continuous flow
of sights, sounds, movement, thoughts and behaviors which, combined,
meld into a story. I was recently asked, “How did you learn to
write scenes?” to which I replied, “The best way I can describe
how I write scenes is that I visualize them as I'm writing (kind of
like a movie playing in my head) and then describe what I'm seeing.”
Though I could produce a reasonable portrayal of a scene with paint
and brush, it would never have the dimension made possible with
narrative.
Q:
How close do you feel to producing the best of all Claude
Bouchard books--and what would set it apart from the rest?
Another interesting question, Reb, which brings to mind a WIP I currently
have simmering in the background. I started writing The Last
Party, a stand-alone, in February this year and this is one which
I am definitely taking my time with. It requires a great deal of
research and the storyline is intricate with a number of distinct but
related sub-plots. I won’t go into detail for now but I envision a
work which, in the end, will highlight how little humankind is, both
physically in relation to the planet and nature as well as in mindset
in terms of pettiness and selfishness. Once it’s complete, it
should rock.
Q:
Do you feel more blessed or rewarded--or both?
A:
I’m blessed for all I have which matters, meaning health, family,
love and friends. I’m rewarded for my efforts. It’s all good.
Q:
Which famous historical figures might you have liked to have
been?
A:
A difficult question to answer with so many great folks to choose
from but I’ve narrowed it down to two. It would be either Benjamin
Franklin, because he was highly talented, intelligent and versatile,
as demonstrated by his accomplishments as a statesman, diplomat,
inventor, writer and scientist or Karl Marx because growing up with
Groucho, Harpo and Chico had to be a riot.
Q:
Of your two protagonists, it would be safer to say that you
relate to lawman Dave. But...Chris Barry shares you initials. Do
tell...
A:
I actually relate to Dave and Chris equally well as they both remind
me of myself to some extent. We all share a very similar sense of
humor and way of thinking. When I think about it, it’s actually
somewhat strange how alike we are in many aspects. In regards to the
initials, Chris went on with that for a while, particularly when I
got onto Twitter as ceebee308. He kept teasing with how I liked him
better than Dave. Crazy guys, I tell you.
Q:
Looking back, can you see any ways that your life was enriched
by that silence?
A:
I have to admit, I don’t tend to look back very much. What’s
done is done and we can’t change the past. However, to answer your
question, I wouldn’t say the silence is what enriched my life as
much as writing my first three novels before my twelve year hiatus. I
can’t say for sure but I don’t know if I would have suddenly
decided to write novels in 2009 if I hadn’t had that three book
foundation already in place. What I do know for sure is I’m damned
pleased I did write them at the time.
Q:
What's the baddest and best about the man Bouchard?
A:
Baddest: Putting it lightly, I frown when I’m annoyed.
Best: I respect anyone who deserves it.
Q:
Can you let a whisker or two of the cat out of the bag about
your future books?
A:
I’m currently working on Femme Fatale, the seventh in the
Vigilante series. It’s based in Paris and though past
central characters are present, it features Leslie Robb, who made her
first appearance two books earlier in 6 Hours 42 Minutes and
was then quite present in Discreet Activities. I’m not sure
exactly when it will be finished but it could release before the New
Year. As mentioned earlier, The Last Party will eventually see
the day but only when it’s good and ready.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome. Just keep them civil, please.